THE CONSTITUTION: A LIVING DOCUMENT?
United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia reveals how our Constitution has been rewriten with CASE LAW, i.e., by the rulings of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the decision in Roe v. Wade violated the Justices’ oath of office to uphold the Constitution in an attempt to legislate law, now claiming to have made abortion a Constitutioal Right!
On September 24, 2008 Great Falls Tribune reported on Scalia’s speech in Missoula Montana on page 4, Section M, which article is quoted from with the gracious permission of the staff of the Great Falls Tribune.
“The U.S. Supreme Court does not have a liberal conservative split, Justice Antonin Scalia told a University audience on Wednesday.
Rather, Scalia said, the court is divided between justices who believe the Constitution is subject to change from generation to generation and those who are ‘originalists’ believing the Constitution is a legal document that should stand through time. Scalia said he is an originalists and therefore in the minority on the Supreme Court.
The notion of a ‘living Constitution that morphs’ changing as justices exercise their ability to add or remove rights, has taken hold, said Scalia.
‘It’s not a conservative-liberal fight on the court,’ Scalia said. ‘It really isn’t. It has to do with what your view of the Constitution is.’ The Judge who believes in the living Constitution is ‘a happy fella’ because in his mind, the Constitution means whatever he thinks it should mean, Scalia said. With originalists in the minority, the Supreme Court rewrites the Constitution term by term, he said . . . It’s a mini constitutional convention whenever you appoint someone new to the Supreme Court,’ he said.” [Emphasis added]
This kind of RAW JUDICIAL POWER has brought America to the identical strait that King Henry found himself in the 12th century with the Pope, and his ecclesiastical court in England.
America’s problem is not with the Pope, and his ecclesiastical court in England. but with the ecclesiastical Supreme Court of the United States of America. Our Supreme Court adopted RAW JUDICAL POWER to replace the Constitution of the United States by ignoring it jurisdictional limitation and started legislating in Roe v Wade .
The Supreme Court said in Roe v Wade:
“We need not resolve the the difficult question of when life begins…the judiciary at this point in the development of man’s knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”
Obviously, the Court relied on the scientific “development of man’s knowledge” based upon Darwin’s doctrine of evolution, in violation of the “establishment clause” establishing Darwin’s doctrine of humanistic atheism as the religion of the land, thereby establishing their own ecclesiastical court.
EVOLUTION ILLUSTRATED
“Intelligent Design” would admit that Henry Ford invented the “Ford Model T Automobile.” However, the evolution theory would claim that Henry Ford evolved into an automobile called the “Ford Model T.” Thus without any engineering or intelligent design this first automobile continued to evolve into what we know today as the luxurious line of Ford vehicles as we know them today!
If this no-brainer would defy all logic as we know the facts that there is extensive research and engineering involved, how could any normally intelligent person even imagine, much less believe the Darwin doctrine of atheistic evolution that our courts have established as our national religion?
God’s Word is the only Answer
They “. . .changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, . . . And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, [i.e., a mind void of judgment] to do those things which are not convenient;” ROM 1:25-28.
As a definite result of putting God’s Word out of our schools and public view such criminality has brought our nation to the condition described by the Prophet in:
ISA 1:21-23 “How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. 22 Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water: 23 Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.”
HOWEVER:
This does not leave us without hope! The Almighty Himself answers the prophet’s question saying:
ISA 1:24-26 “Therefore saith the Lord, the LORD of hosts, the mighty One of Israel, Ah, I will ease me of mine adversaries, and avenge me of mine enemies: 25 And I will turn my hand upon thee, and purely purge away thy dross, and take away all thy tin: 26 And I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellors as at the beginning: afterward thou shalt be called, The city of righteousness, the faithful city.”
How shall ,the Lord Himself do this? By opening the eyes of we the people to see the wisdom God gave our founding fathers in the formation of our BILL OF RIGHTS and the CONSTITUTION which provides that:
All judicial power and/or authority is derived from the Constitution only! Nowhere do judges have the right or power to legislate, or interpret the Constitution based upon their own human reasoning, as the courts have done since Roe v. Wade.
In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its emanates from the Bill of Rights. Ingeniously, the Founding Fathers wanted the grand jury to not be part of the judicial branch in particular, to give citizens the means to seek redress of their grievances without having to ask permission of the sovereign, as the sovereign will nearly always seek to protect its own establishment interests.
Thus, citizens – that is ordinary Americans – have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills,” that is indictments to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding upon which the accused has full Constitutional right to present a defense and seek to prove her innocence. Importantly, even the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allow federal prosecutors to present indictments after a grand jury has issued them, does not preclude citizens from so doing.
In the Williams case, the Supreme Court notably held, in a lengthy and well reasoned and clear cut decision:
‘Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,’ Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the four branches described in the first three Articles. It “is a constitutional fixture in its own right.” United States v. Chanen, 549 F. 2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977)quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58,70, n. 54 (1973), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.’
Thus, our Founding Fathers ingeniously created a “buffer” that the people could turn to when our public officials and others, including judges, criminally violate the law; since only the people themselves will take action to hold them accountable. In this way, the “Rule of Law,” not violence, will seek to preserve the Republic, to avoid armed revolt among the people as occurred in 1776.
The failure of our Justice Department and the courts to recognize crimes and allow prosecution as in the days of King Henry, (especially those committed by the various members of the judiciary in acting under the color of law beyond their jurisdiction) must be brought to the attention of the grand jury for indictment.
As “human knowledge” (or scientific knowledge) increases, or as Roe v. Wade evolves; we have now become faced with the new scientific version of when we become a human being.
Therefore the grand jury is the only safe solution to protect the Civil Rights of every human being. Any attempt to continue swiming in the quicksand of legel proceedings before the Raw Judicial Power of an atheistic judicial proceeding will ony bring about the elimination of any adult segment of the human race considered a nuisance.