Raw Judicial Power
In J. P. McFadden’s book titled Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation, our former President Ronald Reagan openly takes the highest court of our land to task, where he shows how grievously the Justices of that court have violated their oath of office to uphold the Constitution and the law.
President Reagan refers to the Supreme Court’s abuse of their judicial power “as an act of ‘raw judicial power’ (to use Justice [Byron] White`s biting phrase)” (page 16). In his introduction McFadden compares this raw judicial power with the Nazi Holocaust where he says:
“The question remains: Who will listen?”
This comparison between what the highest courts of our land is doing to us as a nation, and the Nazi Holocaust by such distinguished men should open our eyes to see who is to blame for this condition in America.
This failure of our legislature by good people to assume their responsibility in stopping the use of raw judicial power is parallel to the Nazi Holocaust. McFadden charged:
“After the Nazi Holocaust, it was charged that those who knew what was happening (great men among them) failed to halt the slaughter (page 13).
Justice Robert H. Jackson of the United States Supreme Court was the representative of the United States in Nuremberg, Germany, at the trials of high‑ranking Nazi personnel for alleged war crimes during World War II.
It fell to Justice Jackson, among the several prosecutors of the Allied nations, to handle that portion of the prosecution related to the charges of conspiracy. His classic summary to the President and members of the War Crimes Tribunal is anthologized in The Law as Literature 467 (London 1960 Edition), the eloquent, angry, pungent language of which many jurisprudents consider to be a classic in the literature of conspiracy law.
Justice Jackson spoke of,
“this trial’s mad and melancholy record, which will live as the historical text of the twentieth century’s shame and depravity.”
He spoke of how the Nazis asked the tribunal to nullify its own charter, except for which they themselves would have had no right to be heard at all, despite the fact that:
“in the days of their pomp and power, they never gave the right to be heard to any man.”
In this vein, he especially took to task the German judiciary, which he said: “could have remained the last obstacle to this reign of terror,” but outlined how the independence of the judiciary “was soon overcome and it was reorganized to dispense a venal Justice,” by means of “the puppet judges.”
Justice Jackson outlines how the whole group of interrelated crimes fit in with every other in the common conspiracy “like stones in a finely‑ wrought mosaic.” Of Hermann Goring, he noted that he “stuck a pudgy finger in every pie” in order to “help bring the gang into power.”
He then took up each of the other defendants by name and one‑by‑one shows how that defendant advanced the cause of the conspiracy:
”to pour wine on the troubled waters of suspicion … to take up the bloody mantle and build a conspiracy … on a foundation of guiltless corpses, to establish a “new order of authority without law.”
Since our Constitution provides for checks and balances through the separation of powers, it is incumbent upon our Department of Justice, our legislature to enforce our constitutional rights by using their prosecutorial and impeachment power to enforce judges’ oath of office to uphold the Constitution and the Law.
All Judicial power and/or authority is derived from the Constitution only! There is nowhere in the Constitution that give judges the right or power to interpret it based upon their own human reasoning of what they think it should say, as what has taken place since Roe v Wade. Their job is to apply the Constitution as a legal document that stands throughout time.
Their decision must be based upon the black letter of the Word in God’s Word, and the Constitution. The only standard for right or wrong is the Word of God, upon which the Constitution was based.
Any time a judge fails to uphold the law as well as the Constitution they have exceeded their jurisdiction, and their ruling is coram non judice, that is, “before one not a judge,” and therefore, void on its face.
Until you rightly understand the term “raw judicial power” and where it began, you will never understand or believe the magnitude of the arrogance of our judiciary, and their total disregard for the law, or our constitutional rights to life, liberty or property.
Then, and only then, you will begin to either understand or believe the conspiracy set forth in the book “WAKE UP AMERICA THE LORD IS GOD” by Ralph Bouma which includes the procedures used by the U.S. Department of Justice, the F.B.I., and the Judiciary to destroy our Constitutional rights.
In J. P. McFadden’s book titled Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation, our former President Ronald Reagan openly takes the highest court of our land to task, where he shows how grievously the Justices of that court have violated their oath of office to uphold the Constitution and the law.
President Reagan refers to the Supreme Court’s abuse of their judicial power “as an act of ‘raw judicial power’ (to use Justice [Byron] White`s biting phrase)” (page 16). In his introduction McFadden compares this raw judicial power with the Nazi Holocaust where he says:
“The question remains: Who will listen?”
This comparison between what the highest courts of our land is doing to us as a nation, and the Nazi Holocaust by such distinguished men should open our eyes to see who is to blame for this condition in America.
This failure of our legislature by good people to assume their responsibility in stopping the use of raw judicial power is parallel to the Nazi Holocaust. McFadden charged:
“After the Nazi Holocaust, it was charged that those who knew what was happening (great men among them) failed to halt the slaughter (page 13).
Justice Robert H. Jackson of the United States Supreme Court was the representative of the United States in Nuremberg, Germany, at the trials of high‑ranking Nazi personnel for alleged war crimes during World War II.
It fell to Justice Jackson, among the several prosecutors of the Allied nations, to handle that portion of the prosecution related to the charges of conspiracy. His classic summary to the President and members of the War Crimes Tribunal is anthologized in The Law as Literature 467 (London 1960 Edition), the eloquent, angry, pungent language of which many jurisprudents consider to be a classic in the literature of conspiracy law.
Justice Jackson spoke of,
“this trial’s mad and melancholy record, which will live as the historical text of the twentieth century’s shame and depravity.”
He spoke of how the Nazis asked the tribunal to nullify its own charter, except for which they themselves would have had no right to be heard at all, despite the fact that:
“in the days of their pomp and power, they never gave the right to be heard to any man.”
In this vein, he especially took to task the German judiciary, which he said: “could have remained the last obstacle to this reign of terror,” but outlined how the independence of the judiciary “was soon overcome and it was reorganized to dispense a venal Justice,” by means of “the puppet judges.”
Justice Jackson outlines how the whole group of interrelated crimes fit in with every other in the common conspiracy “like stones in a finely‑ wrought mosaic.” Of Hermann Goring, he noted that he “stuck a pudgy finger in every pie” in order to “help bring the gang into power.”
He then took up each of the other defendants by name and one‑by‑one shows how that defendant advanced the cause of the conspiracy:
”to pour wine on the troubled waters of suspicion … to take up the bloody mantle and build a conspiracy … on a foundation of guiltless corpses, to establish a “new order of authority without law.”
Since our Constitution provides for checks and balances through the separation of powers, it is incumbent upon our Department of Justice, our legislature to enforce our constitutional rights by using their prosecutorial and impeachment power to enforce judges’ oath of office to uphold the Constitution and the Law.
All Judicial power and/or authority is derived from the Constitution only! There is nowhere in the Constitution that give judges the right or power to interpret it based upon their own human reasoning of what they think it should say, as what has taken place since Roe v Wade. Their job is to apply the Constitution as a legal document that stands throughout time.
Their decision must be based upon the black letter of the Word in God’s Word, and the Constitution. The only standard for right or wrong is the Word of God, upon which the Constitution was based.
Any time a judge fails to uphold the law as well as the Constitution they have exceeded their jurisdiction, and their ruling is coram non judice, that is, “before one not a judge,” and therefore, void on its face.
Until you rightly understand the term “raw judicial power” and where it began, you will never understand or believe the magnitude of the arrogance of our judiciary, and their total disregard for the law, or our constitutional rights to life, liberty or property.
Then, and only then, you will begin to either understand or believe the conspiracy set forth in the book “WAKE UP AMERICA THE LORD IS GOD” by Ralph Bouma which includes the procedures used by the U.S. Department of Justice, the F.B.I., and the Judiciary to destroy our Constitutional rights.