The Grand Jury Our Only Solution
When I ran for the US Senate in 1984 there was much said about military waist, i.e., like $600.00 for a hammer etc. One of the issues I ran on was that this was fraud, not waist.
President Reagan picked up on that and ordered the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute any possible crimes. Several heads of the corporations involved were indicted and prosecuted.
This is what I see in the matter ACLJ has with Planned Parenthood – what they are alleging is felony crime. Further more the House of Representatives are considering cutting off all funding for Planed Parenthood for being a part of an ongoing conspiracy trafficking young girls as prostitutes, furnishing abortions for those who become pregnant.
These crimes must be investigated by a Grand Jury! The US Attorneys are required by the Black Letter Of The Law to inform the grand jury of any such alleged offence in Title 18 U.S.C3332 which says:
“Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such person, and such attorneys action or recommendation.”
If they fail to do so you can bring the allegations before the court demanding that the Court order the US attorney to comply based upon Title 18 U.S.C3332. In the sad event that the court denies this demand – you have an appeal-able case to take to the Supreme Court.
This would set a president that is vitally needed in light of the unchallenged evidence found in www.wherejusticefailed.com/ URGENT CALL TO ACTION by Edwin Meese!
In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its emanates from the Bill of Rights. Ingeniously, the Founding Fathers wanted the grand jury to not be part of the judicial branch in particular, to give citizens the means to seek redress of their grievances without having to ask permission of the sovereign, as the sovereign will nearly always seek to protect its own establishment interests.
Thus, the grand juries “True Bills,” that is indictments to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding upon which the accused has full Constitutional right to present a defense and seek to prove her innocence. Importantly, even the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allow federal prosecutors to present indictments after a grand jury has issued them, does not preclude citizens from so doing.
In the Williams case, the Supreme Court notably held, in a lengthy and well reasoned and clear cut decision:
‘Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,’ Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the four branches described in the first three Articles. It “is a constitutional fixture in its own right.” United States v. Chanen, 549 F. 2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977)quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58,70, n. 54 (1973), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.’
Thus, our Founding Fathers ingeniously created a “buffer” that the people could turn to when our public officials and others, including judges, criminally violate the law; since only the people themselves will take action to hold them accountable. In this way, the “Rule of Law,” not violence, will seek to preserve the Republic, to avoid armed revolt among the people as occurred in 1776.
The inception of the Grand Jury
The inception of the Grand Jury took place in the 12th century when King Henry could not get along with the Pope. King Henry’s problem was that the Pope had an ecclesiastical court in England into which many of the important cases involving the crown were shunted.
The ecclesiastical court did not charge and prosecute to King Henry’s satisfaction, and he therefore utilized a grand jury to indict those the crown viewed as offenders, whether the offence could be characterized as ecclesiastical or not.
The failure of our courts to recognize crimes and allow prosecution as in the days of King Henry, (especially those committed by the various members of the judiciary in acting under the color of law beyond their jurisdiction) must be brought to the attention of the grand jury for indictment.
Any U.S. District attorney is required by our Federal Criminal Code to inform the grand jury of any information he receives from any person of an alleged offence. Title 18 U.S.C 3332. requires: “Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such person, and such attorneys action or recommendation.”
In Rule 6 Ch.4 sec.101 in footnote 13 the grand jury is eloquently described
“The power of the grand jury is not dependent upon the court but is original and complete, and its duty is to diligently inquire into all offenses which shall come to its knowledge, whether from the court, the prosecutor, its own members, or from any source, and it may make presentments of its own knowledge without any instructions or authority from the court.”
“… Its authority is derived from none of the three basic divisions of our government, but rather directly from the people themselves.’ [Citing case law]”
In UNITED STATES v. CHANEN,C.A.9th, 1977, 549 F.2d. 1306,1312,the courts held:
In our view, tradition and the dynamics of the constitutional scheme of separation of powers define a limited function for both court and prosecutor in their dealings with the grand jury.
But under the constitutional scheme, the grand jury is not and should not be captive to any of the three branches. The grand jury is a pre-constitutional institution,”[citing case law]
ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT
The UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE has embolden our judiciary to violate any and all of Civil and Constitutional rights by their internal policy that no United States District Attorney may prosecute any Civil Rights violations without consent first being granted by their Civil Rights Division.
By refusing to allow the United States District Attorneys for the State of Montana to present their evidence to a Grand Jury of a conspiracy by several Montana State judges to deprive Ralph Bouma and several others of their Civil Rights they are in-fact “an accessory after the fact.”
. Any public servant’s failure to act promptly, such as is required by Title 18 USC <3332 and Title 18 <4 is provided for in Title 18 <3, which says:
“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.”
“Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one‑half the maximum term of imprisonment or fined not more than one‑half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than ten years.”
The author in the book “WAKE UP AMERICA – “The Lord Is God” by Ralph Bouma provides a “Land Mark Case” to set a precedence that the judges, law enforcement agencies, and/or prosecutors whose job it is to protect our “CIVIL RIGHTS” are not above the law, and can be prosecuted to the fullest extent when they are guilty of obstructing justice and/or jury tampering.
Bouma has the hard evidence to prove a conspiracy to deprive several individuals of their “CIVIL RIGHTS” which resulted in a homicide to conceal evidence. This book explains exactly how United States Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, our Judiciary, and the financial institutions all play into each other’s hand to perpetrate the fraud upon “WE THE PEOPLE” of United States of America.
The Almighty tells us in JER 5:1:
“Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek in the broad places thereof, if ye can find a man, if there be any that executeth judgment, that seeketh the truth; and I will pardon it.”
Even so much as to say “seek in the broad places thereof, if ye can find a man,” i.e., one honest Federal Judge who will allow the indictment of a Citizen’s Grand Jury to go to trial!