URGENT CALL TO ACTION
by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese!
In his undated letter to Ralph Bouma, Conrad Montana, received 7-15-10 Former United States Attorney General, Edwin Meese says:
“Urgent Call To Action –
Your Rights Are Being Taken Away”
“My name is Edwin Meese, and I am on the Board of the American Civil Rights Union, as well as former Attorney General of the United States . . .”
Mr. Meese’ contends that ”Conservative Talk Radio, Christian Radio and any Conservative viewpoint are in danger of being shut down! He requests a signature on his Petition to “PROTECT OUR RIGHT TO LISTEN.”
Alliance Defense Fund
In a similar approach in a letter dated July 2010 from Alliance Defense Fund, we read: “I am looking for people who will help stop an alarming epidemic of assaults on Christians and their freedom—not off in some foreign land, but right here in the United States.”
CONGRESSMAN DARRELL ISSA
In his undated letter to Ralph Bouma, Conrad, MT, received July 7, 2010, Congressman Darrell Issa of California speaks of several instances of bribery by our President and legislators and cover-up by the media. He says, “The stench of obstruction was overpowering.”
On page 3 he states: “Just when it looked like the White House might be able to outrun this story, it was revealed that Colorado Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff was offered one of three federal jobs if he agreed to drop out of that race.” That deal was reportedly part of a scheme to buy the vote of sitting Senator Michael Bennet in favor of Obamacare.”
“The White House obviously thinks that public jobs and appointments are their own personal bartering chits.”
“Contrary to the White House’s assertions, this type of election “fixing” is anything but common. There are at least three more federal statutes that apply to these deals, some relating to bribery and some to election tampering.”
“While there are multiple federal statutes that apply in this circumstance, Congress wrote 18 U.S.C., Sec. 600 for this very scenario. The law says whoever promises any employment, position or appointment as consideration or reward for any political activity in connection with a primary election shall be fined or imprisoned, or both.” The implications for Barack Obama’s Presidency are enormous.”
“Close members of his staff could be criminally prosecuted. There’s no telling how far Obama’s efforts to manipulate elections go. Anyway you look at it, Obama is facing a serious scandal that is getting worse by the day.”
President Obama’s science czar, John Holdren
“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,” the authors wrote.
The Supreme Court said in Roe v Wade:
“We need not resolve the the difficult question of when life begins…the judiciary at this point in the development of man’s knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”
Obviously, the Supreme Court violated the “establishment clause” and relied on Darwin’s doctrines founded on the scientific “development of man’s knowledge” to establish that a fetus was not a human being until birth, so now they will surely rely on the new development of man’s knowledge by President Obama’s science czar, John Holdren.
ISAIAH’S PROPHESY IS TRUE TODAY
ISA 59:14-15 “And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey: and the LORD saw it, and it displeased him that there was no judgment.”
ISA 1:16-20 “Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land: But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.”
OPEN LETTER TO Mr. Edwin Meese
The Honorable Mr. Edwin Meese, Esq:
Please recall your refusal to allow prosecution of the Civil Rights violations when United States District attorneys Keith Burrowes and Pete Dunbar pleaded for permission to present Civil Rights violations by the judicial crimes committed against Mr. And Mrs. Bouma and others before a Grand Jury, but as Federal Postal Inspector Robert H. Burnett attest, the “Justice Department adamantly refused to give permission to do so.”
Mr. Burrowes, Deputy U.S. Attorney
In his January 30, 1986 letter to Mr. Ellingwood, Mr. Burrowes, Deputy Us Attorney, says in part;
“. . . I believe, without question, that Ralph Bouma has been mistreated by the bar and the bench of the State of Montana. Further, I believe that he has had property taken from him illegally and without due process of law, all with the knowledge, assent, cooperation and/or active participation of that same bench or bar.
I urge you to do all in your power to arrange for Mr. Bouma to be given an opportunity to meet with and present an overview of his case to the Honorable Mr. Edwin Meese, and to a special investigator to be appointed to review the circumstances. Some of the events and circumstances he will report to such investigator will seem beyond belief in our legal society today‑ I implore you hear him out.”
Doris M. Poppler, US District Attorney
In her November 8, 1990 letter to Ralph Bouma, Conrad, MT, former United States District Attorney for the State of Montana, Doris M. Poppler stated in pertinent part:
“I have carefully reviewed your packet of information, and then conferred with the attorneys in this office who are familiar with the history of the litigation. I am assured that Mr. Burrowes personally went to the Department of Justice and argued on your behalf to the full extent of his ability. I am thus informed that the Department of Justice did not allow this office to proceed. These decisions are binding on our office.”
Sherry Scheel Matteucci, US Attorney
In the August 12, 1997 letter of Sherry Scheel Matteucci, United States Attorney, to Grand Juror Walter Hammermeister to justify removing him from the Grand Jury because of his knowledge of the Civil Rights conspiracy against Ralph Bouma, and the homicide to cover it up. The first stated reason given was:
“As you know, this matter has been reviewed by two of my predecessors. Mr. Dunbar went to some length to generate support for reopening of the Bouma case. Your accusations regarding the conduct of Justice Department attorneys, which I read as allegations of corruption are particularly troubling.”
Herbert E. Ellingwood U.S. Department of Justice
In his September 17, 1986 letter to Ralph Bouma Mr. Ellinwood stated in pertinet part:
“Your materials have been reviewed again at the highest levels, and this department can find no appropriate grounds for federal prosecution. This review revealed no legitimate basis to conclude that there was a continuing conspiracy through 1983; furthermore, revisiting the original allegations , which were investigated and for which a decision was made not to prosecute, is now precluded by the statute of limitations.”
When does the statute begin to run on a judgment “that is void on it’s face?”
Affidavit of Walter Hammereister –
licensed Private Investigator
Mr. Hammermeister attests of his investigation into the death of Robert P. Kropp requested by the local County Attorney. He attests to the clear and convincing evidence of a cover up of the homicide of Robert Paul Kropp to silence his testimony of an arrangement Kropp made with the Montana Supreme Court for a favorable ruling in the Bouma case for $30,000.00.
Mr. Hammermeister attest:
“THAT I proceeded with an investigation of Mr. Robert Paul Kropp. Certificate of death, State File number 83 1427, shows he died in the Mineral County Hospital at 8:17 pm, on March 31, 1983. The immediate cause of death is listed as massive head injuries. There was no autopsy conducted.”
Your “Urgent Call To Action” Mr. Meese:
With your first hand knowledge of the corrupt internal policy of the United States Department for the last several decades –refusing to allow criminal prosecution of Civil Rights violations against any dignitary, you can still reverse it all!
Every Dignitary is a “Fiduciary” of the highest order, i.e., in a position of utmost public trust or confidence, and therefore has zero tolerance for any breach of that trust.
How can any man’s conscience tolerate the thought that Dignitaries are to be held above the Law by the very agency who’s duty it is to prosecute such unthinkable crime?
You must encourage every sitting Grand Juror to use the powers and duties provided for in the Bill of Rights, and United States Constitution as defined in:
In Rule 6 Ch.4 sec.101 in footnote 13 the grand jury is eloquently described
“The power of the grand jury is not dependent upon the court but is original and complete, and its duty is to diligently inquire into all offenses which shall come to its knowledge, whether from the court, the prosecutor, its own members, or from any source, and it may make presentments of its own knowledge without any instructions or authority from the court.”
“… Its authority is derived from none of the three basic divisions of our government, but rather directly from the people themselves.’ [Citing case law]”
In UNITED STATES v. CHANEN,C.A.9th, 1977, 549 F.2d. 1306,1312,the courts held:
In our view, tradition and the dynamics of the constitutional scheme of separation of powers define a limited function for both court and prosecutor in their dealings with the grand jury.
But under the constitutional scheme, the grand jury is not and should not be captive to any of the three branches. The grand jury is a pre-constitutional institution,”[citing case law]
Ironically, in the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branch of government “governed” and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its emanates from the Bill of Rights. Ingeniously, the Founding Fathers wanted the grand jury to not be part of the judicial branch in particular, to give citizens the means to seek redress of their grievances without having to ask permission of the sovereign, as the sovereign will nearly always seek to protect its own establishment interests.
Thus, citizens – that is ordinary Americans – have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills,” that is indictments to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding upon which the accused has full Constitutional right to present a defense and seek to prove her innocence. Importantly, even the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allow federal prosecutors to present indictments after a grand jury has issued them, does not preclude citizens from so doing.
In the Williams case, the Supreme Court notably held, in a lengthy and well reasoned and clear cut decision:
‘Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,’ Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the four branches described in the first three Articles. It “is a constitutional fixture in its own right.” United States v. Chanen, 549 F. 2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977)quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58,70, n. 54 (1973), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.’
Thus, our Founding Fathers ingeniously created a “buffer” that the people could turn to when our public officials and others, including judges, criminally violate the law; since only the people themselves will take action to hold them accountable. In this way, the “Rule of Law,” not violence, will seek to preserve the Republic, to avoid armed revolt among the people as occurred in 1776.
Mr. Meese:
I hereby join your urgent call to restore our CHRISTIAN HERITAGE which was the very foundation upon which this nation was built, and whereas it became the most powerful nation on earth.
As a former United States Attorney General you certainly do not need to be told that there is no statute of limitations on CAPITAL CRIME, i.e., a Civil Rights conspiracy that results in a death!
As you know Mr. Meese our founding fathers recognized the deceitful nature of the heart of man when they incorporated the powers and responsibility of the Grand Jury into our Bill of Rights and Constitution.
Jesus said in JOH 3:19-20,
“And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.”
This why the unbridled Grand Jury as provided for in our Constitution (called a run away Grand Jury) is such a terror to the Department of Justice.
This Open Letter is published by the victim of your obstruction of justice, refusing a Grand Jury to do as required by Constitution and Case Law, Ralph Bouma,
Ralph Bouma 601 8th Ave SW
Conrad, Mt 59425
406-781-3088